Pricing Guide
Attention Insight is one of the more transparent tools in the category — self-serve tiers, published, aimed at designers. The pricing question isn't "how much" so much as "for which job," because saliency heatmaps and video attention curves answer genuinely different questions at different prices.
Subscriptions are shaped by how many analyses you run per month and which features you need, with self-serve plans priced for individual designers and small teams and enterprise plans quoted separately. Current numbers live on their site; the structure is a monthly seat for a set volume of predicted-attention heatmaps on static designs. No per-test fieldwork underneath — it's a prediction tool, same tier as ours, just pointed at a spatial question instead of a temporal one.
How many analyses does your tier include, and what happens when you exceed it? Are video frames counted the same as statics? And the one that decides the whole purchase: is your recurring question spatial ("will they see the CTA, the logo, the price?") or temporal ("will they still be watching at second five?")? A heatmap subscription is excellent for the first and structurally can't answer the second. The full split: PreTestAds vs Attention Insight.
When your daily output is static hierarchy: landing heroes, display banners, banner design, packaging, email headers. Predicted-attention heatmaps tune composition faster than gut feel, and the designer-friendly pricing fits that workflow. The wider saliency field, including enterprise options: Attention Insight alternatives and EyeQuant alternatives.
If the money rides on video ads, the deciding metric is temporal — hook, hold, the drop-off second — and that's priced self-serve too: $49/month for 20 analyses (about $2.45 each), packs from $45, up to 8 free credits, benchmarked against 76 public top performers, on any finished ad — filmed, designed, or AI-generated. Static comps score too (converted to a 10-second stimulus), so a video-led team can cover most of its mix on one benchmark.
Score a video's hook and drop-off second in minutes — up to 8 free credits, no credit card.
Test Your Ad Freeor read a live sample report first — no signup
Attention Insight publishes self-serve subscription tiers priced by analysis volume and features, aimed at individual designers and small teams, with enterprise plans quoted separately. Check their site for current numbers — the structure is a monthly plan for a set number of predicted-attention heatmaps.
Saliency heatmaps predict where eyes land on a static frame or early moments — a spatial answer, ideal for designs, landing pages, and packaging. They don't tell you where a 30-second video loses viewers over time. For that temporal question you want a second-by-second attention curve, which is a different instrument priced at about $2.45 per test.
If your work is static hierarchy — layouts, banners, packaging — a saliency subscription is the right buy. If it's ranking video ads on whether they hold attention, pay for temporal scoring instead. Teams doing both run one of each; the two together still cost less than one live A/B test.